Saturday, 25 January 2014

UN cautions Uganda on extraditing Rwandan refugees
The UN refugee agency has urged government to ensure safety of Rwandan asylum seekers on Ugandan soil and not to breach again the principles international law which protects refugees from being returned to places where their lives or could be endangered.
UNHCR spokesperson for the Great Lakes region, Kitty McKinsey, said they are deeply concerned about recent reports that Rwandan authorities have requested the extradition of seven Rwandan refugees from Uganda.
“UNHCR urges Uganda to take such necessary measures to ensure the protection of refugees and asylum seekers on its territory,” Ms McKinsey noted.
The caution comes on heels of a request made by the commissioner general of Rwandan Police, Gen. Emmanuel Gasana, at the just concluded Regional Police Workshop, seeking permission to repatriate at least seven asylum seekers.
Gen. Gasana, asked President Museveni whether it is possibler to extradite people whom he said run away from prosecution and seek refuge in other countries on claim that they are political victims.
“Criminals after committing crimes from one country run go to another and call themselves asylum seekers; where UNHCR and NGOs come to defend them,” he said.
However, Ms McKinsey recapping last year’ case of Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s ex-bodyguard, Lt Joel Mutabazi, in a statement advised government to “respect the principles of international refugee protection.”
Lt Mutabazi escaped to Uganda in October 2011 after 17-month incarceration at Kami military facility, outside Kigali, where he claimed he was tortured over connections Rwandan dissidents. Rwandan ambassador to Uganda, Maj. Gen Frank Mugambage also said he was part of a wider group behind the recent grenade attacks in Kigali to destabilise the country.
Daily Monitor on January 15 reported that Interpol Rwanda had written to Uganda police to extradite seven Rwandan refugees.
But neither UNCHR nor Rwanda has provided identities of the refugees in question.



Thursday, 16 January 2014

 Cabinet ratifies defence protocol on regional security
KAMPALA: Cabinet Wednesday approved UPDF’ military operations alongside national armies of other East African Community member states, potentially to combat terrorism and rebel activities in the region.
Ms Rosemary Namayanja, the Information minister, said yesterday, the East African Community Protocol on Cooperation on Defence Affairs signed into operation in 2012 by the five Heads of State, majorly seeks to bolster security against terrorism.
“The ground is already set for this Cooperation because there is an established framework to bring the Intelligence Organs and the Police to work together within the East African Community to among others, conduct joint military operations to combat terrorism and other global crimes committed within the soils of the EAC.”
The approval of the protocol comes less than a week after Parliament okayed UPDF’ presence in conflict laden South Sudan-whose membership into the bloc is still under review.
She further, remarked that, Cabinet also authorised the Minister of Foreign Affairs to sign, seal and deposit the Instrument of Ratification of the protocol in accordance with Section 3 of the Ratification of Treaties Act, 1998, Cap. 204. 
The protocol already ratified by the Parliaments of Kenya and Rwanda also seeks to bolster security and stability in the region.
 “Uganda has been a prime mover in the East African integration process and among the key milestones made is this one,” she added.
Under the framework, an attack on Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Burundi or Tanzania, implies hostility against all five.
The minister also said that the protocol states will seek to resolve conflicts within, and between two or more member states, or defend any foreign aggression, through peaceful means in consultation with the African Union or UN. Security Council.
The Tanzanian government last year raised concerns about some clauses in the pact, specifically one that requires member states to “assist each other” during process of war.
It sought precision on whether one country going to war would suck in other partner states, a matter of-factly-yet to be addressed.
Attempts to get comment from the E.A.C secretariat in Tanzania was futile press time, but the Secretary General Amb. Dr. Richard Sezibera, earlier on, directed all member states to ratify the protocol and submit their instruments of ratification to his office.


Wednesday, 15 January 2014

The politics of the oil refinery and the disgruntled north
GULU/KAMPALA:The people in the north are, after passing through over two decades of a piteous life, dissatisfied with the oil and gas status quo in the region and are questioning whether or not it is worthwhile to keep faith and hope alive. ut why is oil stirring doubts in the north?
Touchy issues range from choice of the refinery site, reference to oil as a resource in the west, lack of transparency and limited community involvement. “The people in the north feel sidelined and keep calling us complaining why the government keeps referring to “oil in the west” yet the north has the biggest reserves,” Gulu Anglican Bishop (rtd) Macleod Baker Ochora says. “I think there is a conspiracy to divert the attention of the people.”
Doubtless, oil has been a source of trouble, including ethnic conflicts and secessions in countries where oil kleptocracy, by a section of rent seeking individuals in government, is sustained in disregard of the economic development of the common man.
While the politics of where the oil is located may be looked at as trivial, its benefits to the “oil region” is invaluable; from increased economic activity to, in some instances, getting a privileged loyalty for being host communities.
Former Agago County MP and former Leader of Opposition in Parliament Morris Ogenga Latigo also expressed reservations on the north not being flagged as an oil region.
“That alone,” he says, “tells you a lot about this country, but for the good of us as a country, it is something we should bypass.”
“Gov’t is lucky that Acholi has been through a lot, but the current side-lining would have sparked off an uproar if it were for other regions,” Mr Latigo says, adding that regardless of this disenfranchisement, “our focus as people of the north is on how revenue will be split.”
The Petroleum Exploration and Production Department (PEPD) has consistently been publishing and announcing areas where oil has been struck and which companies were licensed in which area. The department has also been engaging journalists as well as political and traditional leaders from, especially the oil regions, by keeping them abreast of the development so far made in the sector.
Mr Owor Lino Ogora, a resident in the north, says information has not been trickling down and most of the people in the north do not have the information. This, he says, has kept the people out of the loop and thus they cannot plan what and how to invest, or position themselves in order to tap into the sector. “The oil and gas question is tricky. The manner in which it is being handled by the government is cautious and lacks transparency,” he says. “Government should come out and be transparent on issues of revenue and royalties to the people of north.
Gulu District Chairperson and head of the Acholi Local Government leaders, Ojara Mapenduzi, says his leadership has never understood why the government has persistently refereed to oil deposits in Nwoya District as Pakwach Basin oil. “Pakwach is on the other side across the Nile,” he says. “They should at least call it Murchison oil if they don’t want to say it is from Nwoya or northern Uganda.”
However, he says the people from the north may have themselves, or their leaders to blame for especially the lack of pro-activeness. At the end of the day, leaders from the north have to be at the forefront because it is about how much pressure you put on the government.
While the Bunyoro leadership has come out unequivocally to demand for a fair share of the resource, the political leadership in northern Ugandan have sat back and watched.
Mr Mapenduzi believes northern Uganda MPs are not doing enough and are waiting for NGOs to organise oil conferences.
“Our MPs need to wake up and scale up their advocacy so that these issues are worked on,” Mr Mapenduzi says, adding that the lack of local political proactive-ness has left many people in the vacuum, although, at snail speed, being filled by NGOs. But what happens when Gulu Woman MP and veteran politician Betty Aol Ocan believes that the government just does not listen to leaders from the north.
“We will try to push but while power is vested in the west, it is very rare that they will listen to us,” she says. “We can only air our views but no one can take us seriously.”
The prime minister Acholi Chiefdom, Mr Kenneth Oketta, pushes the blame to Total Oil Company, accusing it of not picking a leaf from Tullow Oil Company in Hoima by involving the locals in its local programmes and employment.
Total E&P operates in the Pakwach Basin, Nwoya District, which is believed to have the largest reserves so far - 2.5 billion barrels.
While Tullow is recruiting Banyoro to work in their deposits, Total, Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi says, is playing hide and seek by only distributing vouchers.
“They are doing divide and rule in the north. They deal with the Nwoya chiefdom but they are doing nothing in the rest of Acholi. It should open up to the Acholi region,” he says.
Oil, as Bishop Macleod puts it, should be a blessing and government must be very honest and sincere in dealing with the oil question. “There must be proper procedures of transparency and equity so that resources from oil can benefit all Ugandans rather than a few individuals at the top,” he says.
Another centre of debate is the government’s decision to put the refinery in Hoima.
Commentators think the decision was political and a residue of a political system that survives by allocating resources on the basis of tribe and also show the historical north and south divide in the history of Uganda. “If the ruling government was coming from northern Uganda, there would be possibilities of having the refinery in northern Uganda,” Dr Kisekka-Ntale, a social researcher and political analyst, says.
“It has some political connotations. So the context of whether more oil deposits are found in the north than the south does not arise.” According to information from PEDP, 21 oil and gas discoveries have been made in the Graben and 93 exploration and appraisal wells have been drilled on the different prospects identified by the seismic data.
Out of the 3.5 billion barrels of oil so far discovered, the north, particularly Nwoya District, boasts of more than 2 billion barrels.
Given that 60 per cent of the unexploited part of the Graben is in the north, the thinking among some northern politicians is that the oil reserves in the region are bound to increase, albeit the fact that Neptune consistently hit dry wells in West Nile.
In an email, PEPD Commissioner Ernest Rubondo said when demarcating areas for oil and gas exploration, “government does not consider regions such as north or south. Licensing is done according to Exploration Areas.”
Total currently runs Exploration Areas 1 and 1A, home to Lyec, Ngiri, Mpyo, Jobi, Rii Jobi-East and Gunya discoveries, with 31 wells so far. The government plans to construct 60,000 barrels per refinery on 29 square kilometers in Hoima. Residents in some 13 villages that are to be evacuated are in the process of being compensated.
The decision to put the refinery at Kabaale was made basing on the July 2010 Foster Wheeler report, which noted that the leading sites (Kabaale and Biso) were located south of Lake Albert near the oil fields.
The Petroleum Exploration and Production Department notes, in an email, that during the feasibility study it was put into consideration the fact that exploration activities were being undertaken in the north and a possibility of making discoveries there.
The places that were considered to be possible refinery sites; Majanji, Biso, Katebo, Bukakata, Lwampanga/Kasenyi were all dropped because PEPD says they do not fit in the brackets of good land use, access to infrastructure, local facilities, relative location to market, and requirements for crude import-approximate length of pipelines.
With the refinery in Kabaale, the government will have to construct connecting pipelines to move the oil from all over the Graben to the refinery.
The Ministry of Energy undertook a study that covers distribution and storage facilities for petroleum products from the refinery. The study recommended a refined products pipeline for transportation of refined products to a final collection point in Buloba for distribution to retailers.
The pipeline length is estimated to be about 205km. However, the study and its recommendations are still under review by the government. Officials at PEPD say research shows that refineries need to have an abundant source of water. Oil refineries therefore are often located near navigable rivers or near a port on seashores.
At the minimum, a refinery has to be reasonably far from residential areas and there should be infrastructure for supply of raw materials and shipment of products to markets. The Kabaale site is close to Lake Mwitanzigye–Albert and is also reasonably far from densely-populated villages.
“At the end of the day the refinery will have to be somewhere and no matter where they put it, someone will definitely complain. So the location of the refinery doesn’t matter,” says Mr Mapenduzi. “What matters is that the north should benefit from the resources because we are going to bear the highest risk, especially in terms of the environment.”
Mr Rubondo says although the north is not fully explored, the argument that more wells may be found in the region is inconsequential as the refinery needs not to be directly at the source of the oil.
What is important is to have a crude evacuation system of pipelines through which crude oil is transported to the refinery. And, yes, a study to evaluate the pipeline and storage facilities for crude oil and gas in Uganda was concluded and provides for pipelines from oil fields in the Pakwach Basin and southern fields such as Kingfisher.
But Mr Angelo Izama, an oil commentator, says taking the refinery to Hoima and not in the north where bigger reserves are prospective, ignored the environment risks that will be borne on the north, besides denying the north the benefits that come with the refinery activities.
“If production is located in the south, benefits of downstream business and collated industries too will remain in the south,” Mr Izama, an oil analyst says.
“This potentially sets up a situation where if there is an environment disaster it will be politicised along regional divisions with potentially serious consequences. At this current state a location in northern Uganda may be viable.”
Although he hinted on the land struggles in the north as a possible cause for moving the refinery to Hoima, Minister for Political Mobilisation and the MP from Nwoya, Mr Richard Todwong, says the oil that has been found in the north should be treated as a national resource.


Six bidders for $2.5b oil refinery shortlisted
KAMPALA: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD) on Monday presented names of six firms or consortia shortlisted to bid for construction of the 60,000-barrels-per-day green field oil refinery.
The ministry in early October opened the bid process with Request for Qualification (RFQ) from “appropriately qualified” investors and a total of 75 firms took part.
The Permanent Secretary, Kabagambe Kaliisa, in statement said they were overwhelmed with the significant interests in the Project.
“The interest in the Project RFQ clearly demonstrate that the international community sees real economic and energy opportunities within Uganda’s borders and the broader region,” he noted.
The bidding process was closed in late November and six of eight consortia (association of companies) which submitted detailed Statement of Qualifications have been selected to receive the Request for Proposals (RFP).
The project has entered a second phase and evaluations are conducted by US-based consultancy, Taylor Dejongh.
 The six firms will be issued an RFP over the next 30 days and be required to submit a full proposal for the financing, development and operation of the project whose construction is scheduled for 2015.
 Energy minister, Irene Muloni said government was committed to an open and transparent process in the due process.
 “We look forward to working with our final partner to develop this refinery and further unlock Uganda’s vast energy resources.”
 The selected companies are a South Korean consortium led by SK Energy Company; Chinese consortium, led by Petroleum Pipeline Bureau; Japan's Marubeni Corporation, and Swiss-based Vitol Group SA.
 Others are Russia's RT Global Resources and London-listed Petrofac Ltd.
 The appropriate multinational consortia to lead the $2.5billion project will be announced next year.
The project will be developed in a Public-private-Partnership (PPP) of 40:60 venture. Other East Africa countries are expected to each buy-up a 10 percent stake and so far Rwanda and Kenya have forward commitment.
 A total of 29 square kilometers needed for the refinery plant have been mapped in 13 villages in Kabaale Parish and the compensation of 7,118 people affected is ongoing in Hoima district.
 Meanwhile, France’ Total E&P last week submitted its first Filed Development Plan (FDP) which details how the company expects to start production. Other companies, China’ Cnooc has a production licence for Kingfisher field and UK’ Tullow is yet to acquire one.
 Side bar
Production of oil from the Kingfisher field is expected to start in between 2017-2018.
Government expects to expand the refinery to 120,000-150,000 by 2020-2022.


604 evacuated as gov’t dismisses Machar claims
ENTEBBE: The government yesterday denied claims by Riek Machar that Ugandan fighter jets had bombed mutinied forces loyal to him in Jonglei state.
State minister for International Affairs, Mr Okello Oryem described Machar’s allegations as “a bunch of lies”  intended to “drag and taint” Uganda’s image.
South Sudan plunged into turmoil after President Salvar Kiir accused Machar of attempting to carry out a coup.
Mr Machar told BBC on Saturday UPDF had bombed the Jonglei’s capital, Bor, backing the rival forces of President Salvar Kiir.
But Oryem insisted that UPDF is not militarily involved. “Let him not drag us into their problems. Uganda is not involved militarily. We are just evacuating our citizens. Let him not mislead the world. Uganda would only get involved under the hospice of the United Nations. We are a highly respected country and we cannot just deploy our troops to take sides,” he said.
Forces’s under Machar’s command shot at American aircrafts in Bor on Saturday and injured four soldiers who are now receiving treatment in Nairobi.  Machar’s forces could have mistaken the American planes for Ugandan.
At least 2,000 Ugandans are stranded in Jonglei State, the region that is worst hit by violence ever since fighting started seven days ago in South Sudan.
“We are trying to reinforce the evacuation effort right now. But it’s very risky to land in Jonglei because of the fighting,” the Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Mr Fred Opolot said.
UPDF said it had deployed “a small force” to secure Juba in order to evacuate thousands of Ugandans who stranded in the Capital and by Saturday, at least 604 people had been repatriated to back home by the UPDF.
The acting UPDF Air Force spokesperson, Capt Antony Tabaro, said yesterday they had evacuated 293 people on Friday and 311 on Saturday.
“During the day and night of Friday we rescued 150 and 143 people respectively and another group of 135 and 176 people was evacuated on Saturday using two C130,” Capt Tabaro said.
In the group rescued on Friday, there were 15 Chinese, 16 children and 96 percent of the evacuated were women, Capt. Kiconco said.
In summary

More than 500 people have been reported dead and about 800 wounded in the fracas which started last week on Monday after forces loyal to former Vice President Riek Machar, allegedly tried to overthrow Kiir’ government.
MPs, religious leaders hit back at Museveni on anti-gay law
KAMPALA: A cross section of religious leaders and Members of Parliament have accused President Museveni of aiming to “buy time” and capitulating to pressure from donors by effectively refusing to sign the law outlawing homosexual acts in the country.
They said the legislation has been in place for five years--long enough for the President to study it and make submissions as “he deems fit” so he should stop “fooling the country.”
The MPs, Theodore Ssekibubo (Lwemiyaga County), said the Bill was deliberated several times during NRM caucus meetings and in party retreats at Kyankwanzi, but the President never raises any objection.
“What was he thinking all along?” Mr Ssekikubo remarked, “It’s his lack of decisiveness that prompted Parliament to pass the Bill because; we couldn’t sit there and look on as morals are increasingly breaking down.”
The legislation which currently awaits the President’ signature to come into full practice was passed last week on Friday by Parliament, and it provides for a sentence of life imprisonment for anyone convicted of homosexuality-gays and lesbians.
A proposal to put the punishment to 14 years in jail was rejected by the House.
But, the, President was quoted in a statement from State House on Christmas day saying he will first go through the specifics and if he finds that “it is not right” he would send it back to the Parliament.
 “They (MPs) never consulted me (on the laws). I had told them to wait because I have a lot of work, but they rushed and have passed them.”
Kalungu County West MP, Gonzaga Ssewungu, said Mr Museveni is going astray because “there is no law in this country that justifies a Private Members Bill to first go to him for consultation.”
“He should stop fooling us. The Bill was first of all moved by the NRM deputy Chief Whip (David Bahati) and in all these retreats the President should have begged him not to bring it up for debate,” Mr Ssewungu noted, “We passed it and now he is wasting our time again. If he supports homosexuality let him declare openly but for the sake of our children it should only be practiced in his home area-Rwakitura.”
In a telephone conversation with Saturday Monitor, the Uganda Joint Christian Council (UJCC) executive secretary, Rev. Dr Silvester Arinaitwe, also voiced concerns about the widespread “sodomy in society” the law seeks to address.
“As religious leaders we were consulted in 2009 when it first came up and we advised to drop the clause on death penalty and life imprisonment and since then have not been engaged again. But if these clauses were dropped or revised that I don’t see any other reason for not signing the law,” Dr Arinaitwe added.
The European Union, United States government and several global personalities, have all since condemned Uganda for approving the law which they said is against tenets of human rights---notably “nondiscrimination” as enshrined in international covenants on Civil and Political rights.
Ms Alice Alaso, the Serere Woman MP, accused the President of simply “being diversionary and a sign bowing to pressure from donors to let moral values in the country drop to zero.”
Pastor Martin Ssempa of Makerere Community Church and a renowned anti-homosexuality activist, said, “If the President did not ask for time to consider the Public Order Management Law which equally infringes on human rights why should he need time to sign this one.”
“Personally I think he is trying to deflect hostilities and pressure from donors, but we all critics are under attack from these people but cannot back down in the struggle to uphold morals, and specifically to fight for our children sodomised every day.”
Other Mps, Robinah Nabanja, (Kibaale, Woman) and Katoto Hatwib (Katerera County), who supported the Bill said, despite belonging to the ruling party they will not support the President on failing to sign the law.
Side bar
If the President refuses to assent to any Bill into law and is returned to Parliament for at least three times, Article 91 of the constitution empowers the Speaker to automatically cause the Bill into law if supported by two-thirds of MPs.



Electricity review; Contract dilemmas, Umeme and new Power lines dominated 2013
KAMPALA: The two year’ melodrama of protracted legal battles, kickbacks, indecorous procurement processes and intrigue, from State House to the Ministry of Energy, was finally brought to end with a ‘surprise' giveaway of the Karuma contract.
The contract was awarded in June to a Chinese State firm, Sinohydro Corporation Limited, which was yet to sign contract with government at the time of commissioning; in disregard of a report by Inspector General of Government, Justice Irene Mulyagonja recommending a redo of the entire procurement process.
Works on the $1.4b Karuma dam project started early this month and the 600 megawatts (MWs) is expected after 2018-the completion date.
But the contractor was dubiously awarded contract through a Public Private Public Partnership directly by President Museveni, reportedly after signing bilateral agreements between Uganda and the Chinese government, which will finance 85 percent of the project
Hot off the shelf in the days leading to Karuma was Ayago hydroelectric dam which also has an estimated capacity of 600MWs.
The contract to the $1.9 billion dam project located in Nwoya district was also awarded by President Museveni to a Turkish firm without necessarily any procurement process conducted.
According to a statement from State House, a Memorandum of Understanding between Mehmet Nazif Gunal on behalf of the investor Mapa Construction Company and government represented by Energy minister Irene Muloni was signed on April 21.
Little else was said about the deal but it was also revealed the project would be developed in two phases with Ayago North to have a capacity of 350MW, and Ayago South with an expected capacity of 250MW.
“The most important thing in this project should be efficiency”, the President was quoted saying, however no progress has since been reported on the project and unverified reports claim the contract later withdrawn from the Turkish firm.
Buseruka Mini hydro dam which has an installed capacity of 9MW was commissioned in January to boost electricity access in the districts of Hoima and Masindi. Works on $30M dam located on River Wambabya in Buseruka Subcounty-Hoima started in 2008 by Hydromax Ltd.
President Museveni flagged off work on 183MW Isimba Hydro power dam on River Nile in Kayunga District. The Shs1.2 trillion project was awarded to China International Water & Electric Corporation (CWE), which lost out in the Karuma bidding and later petitioned for a review of the process citing corruption and intrigue.
Under the rural electrification programme the President commissioned the Shs5.2 power line in Nakaseke district; Shs 710 million powerline in Fort Portal, and another Shs21 billion electrification project in Mubende district respectively.
However despite the developments, electricity access around the country remained low concentrated in urban areas majorly and only 14 percent are connected to the grid.
An estimated 90 per cent of Ugandans live in rural areas with less than three per cent access.
Statistics from the Rural Electricity Agency (REA), a government body tasked to steer the programme show that by end of 2012 about 7,968 households of the projected 109,000 had been connected.
REA still maintained that more than 6,000 solar connections and 426 grid extension projects have been implemented countrywide-so far to support social and economic projects for rural transformation but access remains thin.
Similarly, Umeme the main distributor and operator of the main grid warned Ugandans about the possible (and imminent) return to load shedding citing insufficiency of electricity capacity generated.
With darkness already biting hard in some places, the warning came against heels of a technical fault in two of the five turbines at Bujagali dam.
The dam produces a reported capacity of 250MW.
The UK firm which supplies 97 percent of the countries power said load shedding estimated to go up to 2018 (if generation does not increase) can only be averted by switching to thermal plants, to supplement current capacity of 516MW against a demand of 490MWs.
The thermal generation plants are; Aggrekko Lugogo (50MW) Namanve (50MW) and Mutundwe (50MW).
Government had switched off thermal plants in 2012 citing the high cost per unit of electricity produced (after subsidies had been scrapped). But towards festive holidays it (government) was propelled to backtrack on the move to guarantee supplementary.
Thermal power costs Shs779.5 a unit compared with Shs268.8 for hydropower.
Industry players however rubbished Umeme’ claims as “nonsensical” and that of the company bosses merely wanted to recoup their investments in some of the thermal plants.
A Parliamentary Ad hoc Committee sanctioned by Speaker Rebecca Kadaga in 2011 to investigate the nationwide electricity crises, notably high electricity tariffs and load shedding, also released  its report recommending “cancellation of Umeme’ contract” citing incompetence.
In its 159 paged report the committee questioned the manner in which the company came into existence and was awarded contract; its monopoly, and concerns over the high electricity tariffs amidst poor service delivery and a faulty billing system.
The Attorney General, Peter Nyombi, however advised against termination of Umeme’ contract citing several unsavory clauses in the contract with government in which premature cancellation of the agreement implies paying Umeme Shs371 billion [buyout amount], payable within 91 days or else attract additional 20 percent per annum money which is unavailable.
Ms Muloni, who then as managing director of Uganda’ electricity distribution arm (UEDCL), oversaw awarding Umeme the contract stressed: “The company is going nowhere.”
Umeme, which in 2012 issued its first IPO and floated up to 622, 378,000 shares which constitutes 38.6% of the company’s issued share capital upon listing with a view of raising at least ShsShs171billion to pay off debts and use the other part of harvests to invest in distribution, also paid its first interim dividends.
The company also raised call to the Capital Markets to raise over $170 million (about Shs438 billion) to finance its investments in the next five years.
Umeme early this month, further, made proposition that end-user tariffs for domestic consumers be increased by 9.95 per cent starting next year. The proposal once approved by the Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA), the price of electric power used in homes will rise from Shs524.5 to Shs576.69 per unit consumed.
It equally wants tariffs for maize mills and water pumps increased from Shs487.6 to Shs568.48, that for small industries from Shs458.9 to Shs571.24 and for large industries Shs389.63 instead of Shs312.8 per unit consumed.


Ghost students, fraudsters haunt Kyambogo University
KAMPALA: Kyambogo University management has set dates of February 19 and 20 for the 10th graduation ceremony amidst growing revelations of student “mafias” and fraudsters comprising the finalists’ list.
Daily Monitor has learnt management has been shocked by the number of such ghost students who have been unearthed by a Verification Committee instituted last month to, among others, examine student’ fees collections and the number of expected graduates per faculty in the academic year 2010-2013.
University Spokesman, Lawrence Madete, however said yesterday it is still premature to arrive at student’ numbers in the category.
But, “at least the committee has uncovered two things; that there are several students who are not genuine students of Kyambogo but rather fluked and now want degrees, and in another scenario students shared admission numbers with others deliberately to bypass fulfilling their financial obligations.”
He, further, noted the committee is still conducting the fees examination and all students who are confident they paid [in full and were genuinely admitted] are obliged to validate their details or risk missing out on graduation.
A total of 9000 students were supposed to graduate last year but the ceremony was deferred after a staff strike protesting the return of the Vice Chancellor, Prof. Isaiah Ndiege, altered the academic calendar and programmes.
The scam
Management had set fees collection targets of Shs40.5 billion from payments of the finalists but towards the initial graduation dates only Shs19.8 billion was reflected on the accounts.
The monies Shs 20.6 billion was lost in 10 faculties but officials believe it was in the making of the bigger grand fees scam (uncovered last year) peddled by students, some university staff and bank tellers-yet on the loose.
Prof. Ndiege, who had been away on “forced leave” for a year told this newspaper earlier on, “the work of the committee is to leave no stone unturned and establish the problem origin.”
Several students have been faulted and urged to “repay” full fees, but with all bank statements claim they fulfilled their financial obligations and “this would mean double payment.”
An official on conditions of anonymity said: “Many students have full bank statements indicating payments but are not reflected in the university system, a problem management is stuck with.”
The University last year admitted loosing Shs10billion in revenues and at least ShsShs5.5billion in stolen fees for continuing students in the period between management wrangles.
Side bar
The Faculty of  Science and Management which was expected to collect Shs3.5 billion  from 786 students , only Shs1.7 billion is accountable for while  Shs3.2 billion which was expected from Faculty of Engineering  only 1.3 billion was realized .The faculty of Art and Social Sciences fetched only  Shs 5billion against  Shs11.6 billion which had been projected .