Army
rigged 2006 elections for Museveni-Gen Sejusa
Renegade
spymaster, Gen David Sejusa, has confessed that he and other army officers
engineered the 2006 presidential election results in favour of the incumbent
President Museveni.
The
former army MP and coordinator of intelligence agencies who is believed to be
living in UK revealed on Saturday said, Dr. Kizza Besigye won the February 23
vote with (maybe) 69 percent margin but army officers were involved in stealing
the election so the incumbent could remain in power.
“We organised another electoral commission of
intelligence at Basiima House and it is our results that we pushed through to
the [official] electoral commission. How can you win in that type of
situation?”
Speaking
at the launch of a new opposition political party “Freedom and Unity Front” at
the London School of Economics, Gen Sejusa added, “We need to look afresh at
this whole experience of elections.”
The
four-star general who fled the country early this year after authoring a letter
alleging plot to assassinate top political and military leaders opposed a plan
by President Museveni to groom his son Brig Muhoozi Kainerugaba, who commands
the elite Special Forces, as his successor, noted: “I must say it all now
because [I] am a new man. [Yes we did it].”
Electoral Commission spokesperson, Jotham Taremwa when contacted called Sejusa’ claims
“nonsense.”
“Voting
is a public programme that goes through several processes managed by an
independent body, so how then does he claim they were in charge,” Mr Talemwa
noted, “Let him leave us outside his politics.”
President
Museveni was declared winner with 59 percent, Besigye 37 percent, DP’ Ssebana
Kizito with 1.58 percent and UPC’ Miria Obote and Independent Abed Bwanika each
scored below 1 percent.
“Anytime
an African incumbent president is declared the winner by a 50% margin then you
know "he’s lost," Gen. Sejusa noted, in reference to President
Museveni’ margin.
President
Museveni in early October dared Gen Sejusa to go ahead and try using force to
overthrow government and the army has also since maintained he will face
prosecution for his misdeeds.
Sejusa
a spoiler
The
executive director of government’ communication clearing house Media Centre,
Ofwono Opondo referred to Gen Sejusa as a “spoiler.”
“I don’t want to comment on anything related
to Sejusa. He is riffraff trying to seek relevance,” Mr. Opondo remarked by
telephone.
Dr
Besigye, a three times presidential election runner-up and former head of the
largest opposition party, Forum for Democratic Change (FDC), disputed the 2006
electoral results and went to the Supreme Court seeking the nullification of
the polls.
He
contended the electoral process was marred by irregularities, voter
intimidation and rigging, and an unverifiable voter’s register. It was also the
second time Besigye challenged results after 2001.
The
bench comprising of judges; (late) Joseph Mulenga, Alfred Karokora, (late)
Arthur Oder, George Kanyeihamba, Wilson Tsekooko, Bart Katureebe and ‘former’
Chief Justice Benjamin Odoki, after several days of submissions characterised
by tension concluded there had been non-compliance with the provisions of the
Constitution, Electoral Commission’s Act and Presidential Elections Act in the
conduct of the election which disenfranchised the voters.
The
judges in a majority decision of 4:3 also concurred that “In counting and
tallying of results, the principle of free and fair elections was compromised
by bribery and intimidation or violence,” but, “the failure to comply with the
provisions and principles as found was not proved to have affected the results
in a substantial manner.”
Side
bar
In
the April 6 2006 summary verdict Justice Odoki did not give detailed reasons
for Court’ ruling but Justice Kanyeihamba, revealed later that at a
pre-judgment conference of the justices on April 5, 2006 the verdict on
consensus was different from what was later delivered the next that day, and
his colleagues erred in upholding President’ Museveni’ election even when they
conceded that there were massive electoral irregularities.
No comments:
Post a Comment